Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b><i>Online Extra:</b></i> Conn. Tech Company Accuses Facebook of Patent Infringement

By Megan Spicer
October 01, 2015

A small technology company in Simsbury, CT, is taking on one of the largest technology companies in the world.

ConnectQuest filed a federal lawsuit Sept. 17 claiming that Facebook has infringed upon ConnectQuest's patent for a new technology it developed, known as the “close proximity notification system.”

On the consumer's end, ConnectQuest's tech is simple: You download an app and then look for notifications announcing deals, coupons and “loyalty bonuses” for products and services. Businesses use a CQ Beacon, which emits a signal through a physical transponder by using Bluetooth. Smartphones in the area pick up the message and relay it to customers who are inside the business, walking by or driving past.

The Connecticut company secured the patent for the CQ Beacon in September 2014. At the time, the development was considered innovative and was lauded by publications such as Wired.

“Though this company certainly has a way to go before it catches up with the major players in the space, it demonstrates promising momentum, working with several local retail stores and malls helping to market products and promotions,” Wired wrote in a blog post.

In the November 2014, ConnectQuest sent several letters to Facebook letting the social networking service know about its patent, 8,831,624. But, according to ConnectQuest's claim, in January, Facebook nevertheless launched a similar product, called Facebook Beacon. Its initial trial was with six retail stores in New York City.

“These Facebook Beacons provide a signal that instructs a Facebook mobile app on a user's mobile device (e.g., a smartphone) to display what defendant refers to as 'Place Tips' when the user is in proximity to the Facebook Beacon,” according to the lawsuit. In June, Facebook announced it would offer free beacons to businesses across the country.

In its lawsuit, ConnectQuest said its patent “discloses a novel system” for smartphone and mobile device users. It claims Facebook's technology is too similar, and that by manufacturing and distributing its product, Facebook is not only infringing on ConnectQuest's patent but also causing its customers ' the stores that use Facebook Beacon ' to infringe upon the patent.

ConnectQuest is seeking a permanent injunction to prevent Facebook from further infringement, as well as seeking damages.

“[Facebook] has had specific knowledge of the '624 patent at least since [ConnectQuest] sent its first correspondence in or around September 2014,” according to the lawsuit. “[Facebook] willingly and specifically intended to infringe and/or encourage its customers to infringe one or more claims of the patents-in-suit and knew or should have known that its actions would induce its customers to infringe one or more claims of the patents-in-suit.”

Steven Coyle, of Hartford-based intellectual property firm Cantor Colburn, is representing ConnectQuest. He was not immediately available for comment.

Executives at ConnectQuest also could not be reached for comment. Facebook has yet to reply to the lawsuit. Through a spokeswoman, it declined to comment on the lawsuit.

Facebook has been a target of numerous patent infringement lawsuits in the more than 10 years since it burst onto the scene as a social media company. In one such case, in 2012, Yahoo sued Facebook over allegedly infringing on 10 patents, including methods and systems for advertising on the Web. The case was dismissed three months later.

Earlier this year, BladeRoom Group, a British company, sued Facebook for allegedly stealing its data collection technique. The company contacted Facebook in 2011 about the technique, which was faster and more energy-efficient than what Facebook was using before. That lawsuit is still pending.

Megan Spicer, The Connecticut Law Tribune

A small technology company in Simsbury, CT, is taking on one of the largest technology companies in the world.

ConnectQuest filed a federal lawsuit Sept. 17 claiming that Facebook has infringed upon ConnectQuest's patent for a new technology it developed, known as the “close proximity notification system.”

On the consumer's end, ConnectQuest's tech is simple: You download an app and then look for notifications announcing deals, coupons and “loyalty bonuses” for products and services. Businesses use a CQ Beacon, which emits a signal through a physical transponder by using Bluetooth. Smartphones in the area pick up the message and relay it to customers who are inside the business, walking by or driving past.

The Connecticut company secured the patent for the CQ Beacon in September 2014. At the time, the development was considered innovative and was lauded by publications such as Wired.

“Though this company certainly has a way to go before it catches up with the major players in the space, it demonstrates promising momentum, working with several local retail stores and malls helping to market products and promotions,” Wired wrote in a blog post.

In the November 2014, ConnectQuest sent several letters to Facebook letting the social networking service know about its patent, 8,831,624. But, according to ConnectQuest's claim, in January, Facebook nevertheless launched a similar product, called Facebook Beacon. Its initial trial was with six retail stores in New York City.

“These Facebook Beacons provide a signal that instructs a Facebook mobile app on a user's mobile device (e.g., a smartphone) to display what defendant refers to as 'Place Tips' when the user is in proximity to the Facebook Beacon,” according to the lawsuit. In June, Facebook announced it would offer free beacons to businesses across the country.

In its lawsuit, ConnectQuest said its patent “discloses a novel system” for smartphone and mobile device users. It claims Facebook's technology is too similar, and that by manufacturing and distributing its product, Facebook is not only infringing on ConnectQuest's patent but also causing its customers ' the stores that use Facebook Beacon ' to infringe upon the patent.

ConnectQuest is seeking a permanent injunction to prevent Facebook from further infringement, as well as seeking damages.

“[Facebook] has had specific knowledge of the '624 patent at least since [ConnectQuest] sent its first correspondence in or around September 2014,” according to the lawsuit. “[Facebook] willingly and specifically intended to infringe and/or encourage its customers to infringe one or more claims of the patents-in-suit and knew or should have known that its actions would induce its customers to infringe one or more claims of the patents-in-suit.”

Steven Coyle, of Hartford-based intellectual property firm Cantor Colburn, is representing ConnectQuest. He was not immediately available for comment.

Executives at ConnectQuest also could not be reached for comment. Facebook has yet to reply to the lawsuit. Through a spokeswoman, it declined to comment on the lawsuit.

Facebook has been a target of numerous patent infringement lawsuits in the more than 10 years since it burst onto the scene as a social media company. In one such case, in 2012, Yahoo sued Facebook over allegedly infringing on 10 patents, including methods and systems for advertising on the Web. The case was dismissed three months later.

Earlier this year, BladeRoom Group, a British company, sued Facebook for allegedly stealing its data collection technique. The company contacted Facebook in 2011 about the technique, which was faster and more energy-efficient than what Facebook was using before. That lawsuit is still pending.

Megan Spicer, The Connecticut Law Tribune

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.