Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act

By Matthew A. Feigin
October 02, 2015

An old joke holds that there are two responses that are correct for any legal question. The first is, “It depends.” The second is, “The answer is different in Louisiana.”

Those responses may be all a matrimonial practitioner can offer to basic questions about a pre-nuptial agreement: “Is our agreement binding?” “Do I have to disclose all my assets?” “Can we sign it on the morning of the wedding?”

The answers to those questions depend, among many other factors, on the jurisdiction whose law will be used to determine whether the agreement is enforceable. It can be difficult ' if not impossible ' to determine which jurisdiction that will be. The agreement could be tested in the courts of any state where an action for divorce might be filed. Even at the time of marriage, the practitioner could have several such jurisdictions to consider. For example, the couple might have homes in two different states; they might sign their agreement in a third state and celebrate their marriage in a fourth. To craft an enforceable agreement, a practitioner must consider the choice-of-law rules and perhaps the substantive laws of all those four states. Even so, a divorce action might be filed decades later, at which time the parties could be living, and therefore litigating, in a fifth state that neither of them could have anticipated when they married. (The even more serious questions faced by couples who cannot say in what nation they will live are beyond the scope of this article.)

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.