Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 02, 2015

NEW YORK

Former Siemens ' Argentina CFO Pleads Guilty

Following a decade-long, multi-million dollar bribery scheme, and four years after he was first indicted, former chief financial officer of Siemens S.A. ' Argentina, Andres Truppel, pleaded guilty in a New York federal courtroom to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, falsify corporate books and records, circumvent internal controls, and commit fraud.

In 1998, Siemens was awarded a $1 billion contract with the Argentina government to create new national identity cards. In connection with this project, Truppel admitted that he and other Siemens executives paid tens of millions of dollars in bribes to government officials. These payments were used in part to ensure future government contracts in Argentina.

Ten years later, in 2008, multiple Siemens entities from across the world pleaded guilty to violating the FCPA, including Siemens Argentina, which pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA books and records provisions. As part of the plea agreements, Siemens paid $450 million in criminal fines to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and $350 million to the SEC in the civil investigation in disgorgement of wrongful profits.

On Sept. 30, 2015, Truppel admitted that he played “a significant role” in the Argentina bribery conspiracy by concealing the payments made through over a dozen shell companies while fabricating various transactions. Truppel is one of six Siemens executives that have been charged in connection with this endeavor. He is the first, however, to respond to the criminal charges against him.

Truppel's plea deal requires future cooperation with authorities, and pending fulfillment of this condition, Truppel will be sentenced early next year. He will face up to five years in prison and three years supervised release.


Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by Mayer Brown associate Colleen Snow.

NEW YORK

Former Siemens ' Argentina CFO Pleads Guilty

Following a decade-long, multi-million dollar bribery scheme, and four years after he was first indicted, former chief financial officer of Siemens S.A. ' Argentina, Andres Truppel, pleaded guilty in a New York federal courtroom to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, falsify corporate books and records, circumvent internal controls, and commit fraud.

In 1998, Siemens was awarded a $1 billion contract with the Argentina government to create new national identity cards. In connection with this project, Truppel admitted that he and other Siemens executives paid tens of millions of dollars in bribes to government officials. These payments were used in part to ensure future government contracts in Argentina.

Ten years later, in 2008, multiple Siemens entities from across the world pleaded guilty to violating the FCPA, including Siemens Argentina, which pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA books and records provisions. As part of the plea agreements, Siemens paid $450 million in criminal fines to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and $350 million to the SEC in the civil investigation in disgorgement of wrongful profits.

On Sept. 30, 2015, Truppel admitted that he played “a significant role” in the Argentina bribery conspiracy by concealing the payments made through over a dozen shell companies while fabricating various transactions. Truppel is one of six Siemens executives that have been charged in connection with this endeavor. He is the first, however, to respond to the criminal charges against him.

Truppel's plea deal requires future cooperation with authorities, and pending fulfillment of this condition, Truppel will be sentenced early next year. He will face up to five years in prison and three years supervised release.


Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by Mayer Brown associate Colleen Snow.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.