Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Damages In Design Patent Infringement Cases
The successful plaintiff in a design patent infringement case is entitled to recover the greater of the defendant's profits or its own damages, regardless of how the jury desires to apportion the award. Moreover, a plaintiff is not required to apportion those profits to the portion of the infringing device that is attributable to the patented design. Thus, in Nordock, Inc. v. Systems Inc., No. 2014-1762, 2015 WL 5710400 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 29, 2015), the Federal Circuit ordered a new damages trial on the grounds that the amount of defendant's profits assessed by the jury was not supported by the evidence or in accordance with the law. The Nordock decision also contains a warning that post-verdict motions should be made with sufficient specificity.
Successful patent plaintiffs are entitled to compensatory damages, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty. See, 35 U.S.C. '284. The Patent Act grants owners of design patents an additional alternative remedy: the infringer's total profit. See, 35 U.S.C. '289. The Federal Circuit has confirmed that it is inappropriate to apportion the infringer's profits between the patented design and the article bearing the design. See, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 786 F.3d 393, 1001-02 (Fed. Cir. 2005). In addition, the jury has no discretion; where plaintiff has sought a defendant's profits under '289, the jury may not elect to award the plaintiff its damages if those damages are less than the defendant's profits. Nordock, at 11.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.