Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A troubling trend is apparent in medical malpractice actions venued in New Jersey: Over the past few decades, our courts have undermined legislation meant to limit hospital liability for tort claims. These storied and venerable institutions, often originally conceived and operated by religious aid societies, are chartered to provide care to the state's citizenry. The overwhelming majority of hospitals in New Jersey are non-profit institutions that rely upon government programs such as Medicaid and charitable care reimbursements for those patients without medical insurance.
Many hospitals, in an effort to improve economies of scale as well as increase negotiating power, have merged into behemoth hospital systems, incorporating a regional or state-wide presence with five or more hospitals combined. Others have stuck to their roots, remaining small, independent community-based institutions. More recently, a third type of hospital has emerged: the for-profit hospital, a type previously unseen but that now has taken over several different institutions in the state of New Jersey.
The variety in hospital structure has lead to a marked disparity ' almost a class system ' among the hospitals. The largest hospital systems generate enormous revenue streams, employ multiple physician groups and enjoy better reimbursement rates from the larger health insurers because of their negotiating power. Similarly, the for-profit hospitals, due to their lack of participation in most health insurance plans, are able to charge service rates significantly higher than the usual negotiated rates for “in-network” providers, likewise leading to large revenue streams. The community hospital, on the other hand, is at the whim of the insurer, often forced to accept reduced service rates, and has higher than average numbers of charity care patients, resulting in a revenue stream that is incapable of meeting or exceeding expenses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.