Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Subrogation Claims Against Medical Care Providers Reinstated
A Florida appeals court has reversed a trial court's dismissal of claims made by third parties against medical care providers, after concluding that they had a legitimate interest in not paying an injured plaintiffs damages attributable not to the negligent operation of a motor vehicle, but to medical malpractice. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Theodotou, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11187 (Fla. 5th DCA 7/24/15).
The plaintiff in the underlying case, Benjamin Edward Hintz, was struck by a car driven by Emily Boozer while riding his scooter. Boozer and her father (who owned car) were found liable for damages of more than $11 million. Their auto insurer, Allstate, paid the policy limit of $1.1 million, but the remainder is still unpaid. During trial, the the defendants had attempted to present evidence that Hintz was negligently treated for his injuries by two doctors at Holmes Regional Medical Center, but they were prevented.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?