Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Same Evidence Used to Reject Bias Claim, Support Retaliation Claim
The (over)use of the summary judgment process in employment discrimination cases has been heartily scrutinized over the years. As this'author has pointed out, there is at least one prominent federal judge (U.S. District Judge Mark W. Bennett of the Northern District of Iowa) who thinks the use of summary judgment, as a practice, should be eliminated in these types of cases. (See Time to Abolish Summary Judgment in Employment Law Cases? published in this newsletter's ALM affiliate The Legal Intelligencer on July 26, 2013.)
Often, federal courts are loath to meddle with most employment-related business decisions, claiming it is not for the courts to second-guess as a kind of “super-personnel department.” The result is frequently a judicial rubber stamp of sorts, giving employers the imprimatur to fire/discipline at will.
Of course, when courts do undertake the fact-intensive approach to employment disputes and apply legal standards intended to allow juries to decide these cases, the summary judgment process can backfire for the employer. As we have all heard countless times in our legal careers, it is the facts that drive the case. Take, for example, the decision rendered last month in Lassiter v. The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia (E.D. Pa. Sept. 21, 2015, No. 14-1037).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.