Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Aug. 27, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., 362 NLRB No. 186, a sweeping decision that expands the definition of “joint employer” for purposes of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Abandoning 30 years of precedent that required “direct” and “immediate” control over employees' working conditions for a finding of joint employer status, the NLRB held instead that “indirect” or “potential” control is sufficient. Moreover, no longer does the employer actually have to exercise any control for a finding of joint employer status. Rather, as long as some degree of direct or indirect control is reserved for the putative joint employer in the contract with the labor provider, that alone is sufficient to establish joint employment. In the divided decision, two members of the five-member board issued a sharp dissent, characterizing the new standard as a departure from the common law agency standard applied by the NLRB for decades.
Ambiguity over Certainty
The board's new joint employer standard contains substantial ambiguities, such as which employment terms are “essential,” and the decision raises as many questions as it answers. As stated by the dissent, the majority “abandon[ed] a long-standing test that provided certainty and predictability, and replace[d] it with an ambiguous standard that will impose unprecedented bargaining obligations on multiple entities in a wide variety of business relationships, even if this is based solely on a never-exercised 'right' to exercise 'indirect' control over what a Board majority may later characterize as 'essential' employment terms.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.