Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
“DJ Logic” Loses Trademark Suit
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan decided that DJ/turntablist Lee Kibler didn't have a strong, enforceable trademark for the name “DJ Logic,” which he has used since 1999. Kibler v. Hall, 14-10017. Kibler sued rapper Robert Hall, who has performed as “Logic” since 2009. Senior United States District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow noted in part: “Plaintiff has produced no survey evidence showing consumer recognition of his mark. Likewise, he has produced no evidence concerning the marketing of his albums. Plaintiff has sold less than 300 albums over the past three years and less than 60,000 since release of his first album sixteen years ago. He currently has no recording contract, and his past recording contracts were not with a major label. In sum, the evidence shows that Plaintiff's mark has little commercial strength.” Judge Tarnow added that the use of “Logic” by other musicians further weakened Kibler's mark: “Defendants have identified various musicians who, like Plaintiff, market music online under a name incorporating 'logic' or a variation thereof ' some of whom also incorporate 'DJ' into their name.” The district judge later observed: “Considered in its totality, the 'DJ Logic' mark is significantly distinct from Defendant Hall's 'Logic' mark. The 'DJ' portion not only changes the look and sound of the mark but also describes or suggests certain characteristics of Plaintiff's music.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.