Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sports team acquisitions have garnered headlines over the past few years, with several recent team prices ranging in the billions of dollars. Since 2000, the top five U.S. team sales were at prices in excess of the billion dollar threshold, the highest being the $2 billion sale of the NBA's Los Angeles Clippers in 2014 and the $2 billion sale of MLB's Los Angeles Dodgers in 2011. In New York, the NFL's Buffalo Bills were purchased in 2014 for $1.4 billion. Not long ago, sports franchises were run like small businesses, with any net profit generated being an additional, but not always expected, benefit. Today, given rising acquisition costs and the lucrative revenue opportunities teams offer, they are run as sophisticated enterprises with the purpose of yielding profit for their well-heeled investors.
On the surface, the buying and selling of a professional sports team may seem like a regular M&A transaction. However, the many issues unique to the sports industry give these deals complicated twists that require extensive due diligence and the guidance of experienced counsel well-versed in a number of areas specific to the sports landscape. Potential team buyers and sellers need to be able to navigate the transaction process under the watchful eyes of respective leagues and governing bodies, while negotiating a plethora of business and legal issues.
However, professional sports teams are limited commodities. Within the four major leagues, there are only 122 teams. As team values increase, the pool of potential buyers who can afford to purchase them dwindles. With a limited pool of qualified potential buyers, competition among them is fierce, as teams do not change ownership often. This trend is common to all of the major leagues. The limited supply and large demand further contributes to the rise in team valuations, thus creating a continuous cycle that drives team prices upward.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.