Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Virtually every retail lease contains what is commonly referred to as the “Construction Exhibit.” Certain retail leases divide the Construction Exhibit into several smaller exhibits that address different portions of the tenant's construction work, including plan submittal, application for permits, insurance, lien waivers, signage, security and construction deposits. In addition, virtually every retail lease addresses a category commonly referred to as “chargebacks.” The chargebacks address certain items for which the landlord seeks payment or reimbursement from the tenant for various aspects of the tenant's construction work. These construction chargebacks may include:
This article addresses the manner in which retail leases attempt to assess these construction chargebacks, and also discusses the manner in which a tenant should address these construction chargebacks in its comments to the landlord's draft of a retail lease.
Barricade Charges
The most common of all construction chargebacks in a retail lease is the barricade charge. Prior to commencement of the tenant's construction, the landlord will seek to have a barricade installed between the common area in front of the premises and the premises itself. Tenants often seek to construct this barricade themselves, in order to control the cost and also to control the design of the barricade. Generally, however, each landlord will want to keep its barricades uniform, and will seek to construct the barricade on the tenant's behalf. Often, the landlord will seek to place graphics on the barricade and/or create a door within the barricade that the tenant can use to access its construction area within the premises. For these materials and services, the landlord will seek to impose a construction chargeback that is assessable to the tenant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.