Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If in-house legal departments are holding tighter to their company's legal work and going to fewer law firms when they do send out work, the best time to get an “in” with a legal department may be when they switch general counsel. And that is also when existing firms need to fight to keep their relationships.
Former DuPont general counsel and current Ballard Spahr partner Tom Sager says that in-house counsel continue to be under pressure to control costs and the landscape is “very competitive” for outside law firms. For every client a firm picks up, it might lose another, he explains. “It really behooves firms to solidify relationships with major, sustainable clients,” Sager says. “Those are the anchors to either stabilize or further build their practice.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.