Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationRegulationTechnology Media and TelecomSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

111010001: An Article of Commerce?

By Bryan Kohm and Stefan Szpajda
December 31, 2015

In ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. ITC, No. 2014-1527, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 19558 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2015), the Federal Circuit limited the International Trade Commission's (ITC) jurisdiction over digital commerce. In a 2-1 decision, the panel held that the ITC lacks authority to regulate digital imports. (Note: Digital imports are limited to electronically transferred data, not digital data imported on physical medium, such as disks or drives.) Id . at 12. In light of the recent en banc decision in Suprema, Inc. v. ITC, 796 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2015), the panel's decision is unlikely to be the final word on the issue.

The ITC Investigation

The Commission instituted the underlying investigation regarding whether ClearCorrect Operating, LLC and Clear Correct Pakistan (Private), Ltd. (collectively, “ClearCorrect”) infringed seven patents. ClearCorrect manufactures orthodontic appliances, known as aligners, by first creating a digital recreation of a patient's teeth in the United States and electronically transmitting the digital file to Pakistan. The file is used to create digital data models of tooth positions. ClearCorrect then electronically transmits the digital models to the United States, which are used to make aligners by thermoplastic molding.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?