Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Chapter 11 Plans of Reorganization and Equipment Lessors
Filing Chapter 11 is a very expensive proposition these days. The filing fees, coupled with the astronomical attorneys' and special litigation counsels' fees, plus the accountants' fees, are just a few of the expenses for a debtor-in-possession (“DIP”). So what does this mean for us as equipment lessors? It means we must react accordingly and often very quickly to protect ourselves.
It means that many company DIPs set up their exit strategy before they file Chapter 11 to minimize the time that they are in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding and thereby minimize their costs for attorneys and other fees that the DIPs incur. That equates to us, as equipment lessors, having to play catch-up after being taken by surprise by a slew of so-called “First Day Motions” (such as Motions to Approve Cash Collateral or Debtor-in-Possession Financing, Motions to Pay Pre-Petition Wages, Motions to Pay Utilities, Motions to Pay Critical Vendors, Motions to Employ DIP Attorneys and others similar motions). You might even see a Motion to Sell Substantially All Assets of the DIP, or a Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization filed just a few weeks after the Chapter 11 filing. Just as we are reading the court orders on the First Day Motions, we are inundated with additional pages of documents to read and analyze in order to protect our rights before it's too late.
At this point the equipment lessor might have already decided to engage its own attorney to review the various DIP motions for their respective impact on the equipment lessor. It is generally best to know what relief the DIP seeks and determine its impact on the equipment lessor before there is a binding court order permitting the DIP to infringe on an equipment lessor's rights.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.