Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Forensic Clairvoyance'
Attorneys take a variety of approaches to client preparation in advance of a child custody evaluation, ranging from a “hands-off” stance (sending their parent litigant off to the assessment with no guidelines about how to handle the process) to hours of guidance ' what to be careful about, what materials to offer the evaluator, etc. When preparation is provided, a rational and understandable assumption often held by both litigants and the lawyers that represent them is that there will be a chance during the assessment to respond to all central allegations made by the other parent. Sadly, such trust in the fairness of the evaluation process is, in some cases, quite misplaced, and can lead to unfortunate outcomes.
Peer reviews of the custody evaluations of other mental health professionals have revealed a worrisome approach to assessment, represented by the following case example: The mother in a custody matter describes for the evaluator an alleged pattern of threats, intimidation and episodic violence on the part of her husband over the past three years. She states that some of the frightening behavior happened in front of the couple's child. The evaluator also hears from the husband that the mother had, on occasion, thrown things at him when she was angry, and that their child watched this. Neither party is asked about the allegations made by the other, and no information confirming violence is gleaned from the collaterals, yet the evaluator proceeds to conclude that the father appears to be a coercive-control batterer.
Special Powers
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?