Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ninth Circuit: Appellate Review of Telemarketer Convictions and Sentences for Sale of Unregistered Securities
On Dec. 4, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rendered its decision in United States v. Lloyd, 2015 WL 7873401, a case involving the sale of unregistered securities. The five defendants worked for telemarketing “boiler rooms” (outbound call centers) in California and Florida and were responsible for soliciting investments to finance production and distribution of films. Approximately 650 individuals invested a total of over $23 million after the defendants promised high returns with little to no risk, and many of these individuals lost their entire investment.
The indictments against the individuals ' all of whom were connected to two movie production companies ' charged conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud and securities fraud, spanning a period from 2001 to 2009. The two managers for the California and Florida offices (Lloyd and Keskemety) pleaded guilty and appealed their sentences. One telemarketer (Greenhouse) convicted after a trial appealed his sentence, and two additional telemarketers (Nelson and Baker), convicted at the same joint trial as Greenhouse, appealed their convictions and sentences. The Ninth Circuit affirmed Lloyd's sentence, vacated Keskemety's sentence and remanded for resentencing, reversed Nelson's conviction, affirmed Baker's conviction, and affirmed Greenhouse's sentence. The court noted that “[t]he number of defendants, the lengthy period involved, and the type of conduct made this a difficult case for any trial court to resolve. The record shows that the district judge competently and fairly resolved many of the innumerable issues that arose in trial and at sentencing. The points on which we disagree with the district judge raise issues that are both complex and close.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?