Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In late March of last year, the UK adopted legislation aimed at combatting slavery and human trafficking: the “Modern Slavery Act 2015″ (“the Act”). It includes a specific compliance disclosure legal obligation that has been in force since Oct. 29, 2015. Also in October, the UK government published “Transparency in Supply Chains, A Practical Guide” (“the Guidance”) in order to provide guidance about the compliance requirement.
This legislation affects any business from anywhere (i.e., not just businesses based in the UK) so long as the business meets a UK '36 million turnover threshold (USD $55.281 million) and sells goods or services into the UK.
The UK legislation takes its inspiration from California, which in 2010 adopted the “California Transparency in Supply Chains Act” (“the California Act”). This requires retail and manufacturing businesses with worldwide annual gross receipts over $100 million and annual Californian sales exceeding $500,000, doing a certain amount of their business in California, to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery from their supply chains.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?