Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Almost Instant' Change of Domicile Thwarts Motion to Dismiss
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia recently declined to dismiss a diversity action for wrongful death brought by the estate of a man who was medically treated in Virginia, then moved to Idaho for a short time before his sudden death. Despite the fact that the man had lived in Idaho for only nine days, the court found adequate evidence that the deceased had changed his place of domicile from Virginia to Idaho prior to his death. Bagheri v. Bailey, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149859 (W. D. Va., 11/4/15).
Sean Matthew McKee went to Russell County Medical Center Emergency Department in Russell County, VA, on June 7, 2013, complaining of chest and back pain, shortness of breath, nausea, and a fever. Defendant Dwight L. Bailey, M.D., saw the patient, diagnosed him as suffering from acute bronchitis, and released him from care that same night. On June 12, McKee, along with his wife and two children, moved from Lebanon, VA, to Post Falls, ID, where Mrs. McKee's mother and brother lived. They arrived in Idaho on June 16 and moved in, temporarily, with the mother. Mr. and Mrs. McKee soon both interviewed for jobs at Qualfon (a call center), and both were offered positions, though there was some dispute during motion practice as to whether Mr. McKee had accepted the offered position. On June 25, 2013, Mr. McKee began to suffer from shortness of breath. Paramedics took him to the hospital, but he died soon after arrival. An autopsy showed that the cause of death was a pulmonary artery thromboembolism and bilateral pulmonary infarcts, which the plaintiff contends should have been diagnosed by Dr. Bailey on June 7.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.