Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
California's utility regulators last month fined Uber Technologies Inc. subsidiary Rasier-CA LLC $7.6 million for failing to submit operations records on time last year.
Without comment, the Public Utilities Commission unanimously upheld an administrative law judge's July 2015'decision'to slap Rasier ' operator of UberX ' with $7.3 million in penalties for withholding data, including documentation about safety-related incidents and service to disabled passengers. The commission tacked on another $300,000 for the company's 28-day delay in complying with a final order demanding the records.
Uber must pay the fine within 30 days or the commission will suspend its operating license in California.
An Uber spokeswoman said the company will pay the $7.6 million to ensure ride-hailing operations continue. But the fight isn't over.
'While we are disappointed with the decision, we look forward to making our case to the California Courts of [Appeal],' said Eva Behrend.
No shrinking violet when it comes to challenging regulators, Uber initially complained last year that the data sought by the PUC weren't available or, if submitted, would risk passengers' privacy. After the judge issued his order, the company began supplying records to the PUC but still insisted in its appeal to the commission that the fine was excessive, especially in light of a $30,000 settlement competitor Lyft Inc. reached with state regulators over a similar document dispute.
Uber was represented by Davis Wright Tremaine in the PUC proceedings.
–'Cheryl Miller, The Recorder
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.