Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Much like Donald Trump, Facebook or even the Kardashians, the cloud is everywhere. In our personal lives, it often keeps our family calendars, stores our videos, hosts our e-mails and runs our Fantasy Football games.
In a professional capacity, the cloud is also mainstream. A recent survey of 940 IT business professionals found that 93% of their organizations use the cloud. Mainstream companies such as Rackspace and Amazon thrive by selling managed cloud services. Phone systems run off the cloud, and many popular applications such as e-mail and document storage systems rely on it.
However, for attorneys, the use of the cloud in law firms is a different story. Many lawyers shy away from relying on the cloud for professional services due to concerns about privileged information, compliance with regulations or a desire to ensure secure operations.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.