Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Anti-concurrent causation clauses (“ACC clauses”) in all-risk first-party property policies were developed to contractually exclude coverage under a policy for a loss caused by a combination of covered and excluded causes of loss. ACC clauses generally preclude coverage for a loss where an excluded peril contributes directly or indirectly to a cause of loss “regardless of any other cause or event that contributes concurrently or in any sequence to the loss.” As explained in the following excerpt from the IRMI Glossary of Insurance and Risk Management Terms, www.irmi.com, the clause applies:
' either in sequential-cause situations, where the first event sets in motion a chain of events that causes a second event that causes the loss, or concurrent-cause situations, where two or more causes of loss happen simultaneously to produce the same injury or damage. If any cause of loss falls within the terms of a policy exclusion that is accompanied by ACC language, the loss will be excluded, regardless of whether another unexcluded cause of loss qualifies as the “proximate cause” under the jurisdiction's common law rules.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.