Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Court Watch

Court Dismisses Franchise Act Claims <br>Court Grants Franchisor's Motion to Compel Arbitration

9 minute read January 31, 2016 at 11:00 PM
By
Bryan Huntington and R. Henry Pfutzenreuter
Court Watch

Court Dismisses Franchise Act Claims

Businesses alleging their status as franchisees are often quick to assume the applicability of protective franchise acts and rely upon them as leverage against the alleged franchisor.

This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.

October 01, 2026