Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Seventh Circuit: Military Government Contractor's FCA Summary Judgment Upheld for Lack of Materiality, Knowledge
On Dec. 11, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit announced its decision in United States ex rel. Debra Marshall v. Woodward, Inc., No. 15-1866, 2015 WL 5895976 (7th Cir. Dec. 11, 2015), in which Woodward, a designer, manufacturer and service provider of control systems in the aerospace and energy markets, was accused of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) based both on its sale of certified helicopter engine parts and the termination of two employees (also the whistleblowers in the lawsuit). The District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment in March 2015, and found that Woodward's actions did not violate the FCA (or Illinois law).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.