Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In October 2015, I published an article titled “NLRB's Misguided 'Joint Employer' Thrust Against Franchising,” (NYLJ, Oct. 22, 2015). I reported on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel's efforts to have franchisors declared “joint employers” of their franchisees' employees, and how the NLRB general counsel's thrust clashes with the business structures and norms of franchising, the Lanham Trademark Act, and every federal and state franchise law extant in the United States.
In this article, I analyze how the NLRB general counsel's approach is refuted by 50 years of virtually unanimous judicial decisions, and address a recent NLRB decision greatly expanding who may be deemed a “joint employer” (and how this decision discarded 30 years of NLRB precedent). I also discuss the harsh consequences that may pertain should the NLRB general counsel succeed in his efforts to have franchisors declared the “joint employers” of their franchisees' employees.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.