Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

$596 Million Stock Offering For Burger King Parent

By Mary Hladky
February 29, 2016

Greenberg Traurig corporate and securities shareholders Kara MacCullough and Flora Perez barely slept for eight days. That's the time they had to complete a secondary public offering for their client Restaurant Brands International, or RBI, parent of Miami-based Burger King and Oakville, Ontario-based coffee, doughnuts and sandwich chain Tim Hortons.

Typically, this type of transaction would be completed in about a month. But the offering priced Dec. 9, and RBI wanted it closed by Dec. 15 before the securities markets all but shut down for the holidays and to take advantage of market conditions, they said.

The offering involved the sale of more than 17.5 million shares owned by limited partners of 3G Capital Partners, a Brazilian private investment group that acquired Burger King in 2010. Burger King created RBI in 2014 when the fast-food chain acquired Tim Hortons for $11 billion.

The stock sold for $34.30 per share for net proceeds of $596 million that went to the limited partners who wanted to diversify their holdings.

“What was interesting and challenging about this transaction is that RBI is a dual-listed company” on the New York Stock Exchange and Toronto Stock Exchange, MacCullough said. “That is relatively unusual.”

As a result, the transaction had to comply with different securities regulations in the two countries. That required coordinating with the other law firms on matters such as timing and content of the registration statements, compliance with disclosure obligations and the content of legal opinions and comfort letters prepared by auditors for underwriter Morgan Stanley.

The Tim Hortons acquisition created the world's third-largest fast-food chain. Burger King, which closed on a lease for its new Miami headquarters at Waterford at Blue Lagoon corporate park in January, has more than 14,600 franchised restaurants in about 100 countries. Tim Hortons has more than 4,800, primarily in Canada.

The two chains are run independently, and company officials have said there are no plans to combine the product offerings at their restaurants. Going forward, Restaurant Brands intends to increase the number of Burger King restaurants worldwide. Expansion for Tim Hortons includes a plan to open 150 new restaurants in Ohio.

Restaurant Brands is part of the food empire assembled by 3G Capital, known for aggressive cost-cutting to boost profitability, that also includes Anheuser-Busch InBev, Heinz and Kraft.

' Mary Hladky, Daily Business Review

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.