Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cloud computing may be here to stay, but is it truly safer than the solutions that it's outmoding? The Legal Cloud Computing Association (LCCA) thinks there's a path to greater security, publishing for law firms its first “Cloud Security Doctrine.”
According to a statement announcing the doctrine's release, this “inaugural set of security standards” will aid in bringing together firms and those within the legal tech world to employ best practices and address concerns over cybersecurity “collaboratively and transparently.”'
In discussing the need for cloud security standards, Jack Newton, founder and CEO of Clio, a practice management provider and member of the LCCA, says: “Over 20 ethics opinions on cloud computing provide guidance that cloud computing is acceptable for lawyers. Every opinion refers to a 'reasonable care' standard, and it is left to the individual lawyer to perform due diligence on what exactly 'reasonable care' looks like. The LCCA wants to provide concrete guidance on what we consider a reasonable baseline for security so that lawyers, bar associations, law societies and other stakeholders have a clear set of criteria to apply to cloud computing providers that service the legal space.”
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?