Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Questions of Fact Preclude Dismissal of Claim Against Condominium Board President
Pascual v. Rustic Woods Homeowners Association
NYLJ 12/24/15, p. 23, col. 3
AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by condominium unit owner for injunctive relief against the condominium board's president and the managing agent, unit owner appealed from Supreme Court's order denying unit owner's summary judgment motion and from Supreme Court's judgment dismissing the complaint against the board president. The Appellate division modified to reinstate the complaint against the board president, and otherwise affirmed, holding that neither party had established entitlement to summary judgment on the claim that the board had acted outside the scope of its authority.
In 2012, the condominium board voted to fund a repair project through special assessments, and the managing agent included a charge for the special assessment on unit owner's bills for common charges. Unit owner then brought this action contending that the special assessments were enacted in violation of the condominium's bylaws. Supreme Court denied unit owner's summary judgment motion, and dismissed the complaint against the board president and the managing agent. Unit owner appealed.
In modifying, the Appellate Division concluded that neither party had established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether the board's actions were beyond the scope of the board's authority. As a result, the court held that the board president was not entitled to dismissal. The court held, however, that the managing agent was entitled to dismissal because the agent was acting at all times as an agent for a disclosed principal and did not intend to be personally bound.
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.