Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
“There are only two types of companies: those that have been hacked and those that will be.” ' Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Robert Mueller
In today's world, no one is immune from the risk of a data breach. Hardly a week goes by when the news does not report on a company or government entity suffering a catastrophic loss of private and privileged confidential personal data. These losses are not just happening to the unsophisticated, but to major companies and organizations. In June of last year, the Federal Government's Office of Personnel Management suffered a data breach that exposed the personal data of at least 4 million current and former federal employees.
The loss of information from Sony Pictures, Target and many others highlights the fact that no organization is immune. A study by the Ponemon Institute in Michigan found that the average cost of a corporate data breach last year was $3.5 million. The U.S. Department of Defense noted that “[e]very year, an amount of intellectual property larger than that contained in the Library of Congress is stolen from networks maintained by U.S. businesses, universities, and government departments and agencies.” For anyone doing business today, an understanding of the basis for potential liability ' both statutory and civil ' for such losses of information is essential, not only to limit liability or to keep your organization out of the news, but to protect and professionally service your clients and business partners.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.