Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Fed. Ct. Upholds Philharmonic's Firing of Musician

By Joel Stashenko
February 29, 2016

The Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra (BPO) had little choice but to fire its principal oboist for his repeated clashes with the symphony's conductor, other musicians and staff, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York found in upholding the “fair and just” findings of an arbitrator. Roy v. Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra Society Inc., 15-CV-0283.

District Judge Michael Telesca wrote that the arbitrator had ample evidence to justify the dismissal of oboist Pierre Roy in July 2012. It was the second time Roy had been fired in less than two years due to abrasive behavior. Fellow musicians complained that Roy played off-tempo or off-pitch at rehearsals to throw them off, mocked his colleagues and engaged in “intimidating, abusive and disruptive behavior” toward symphony staff and other musicians, according to Judge Telesca's decision.

The district judge also found there was no basis to support Roy's claim that the arbitrator gave “unfair weight” to the testimony of colleagues who said he engaged in unprofessional behavior: “Arbitrator Rabin did not exceed his authority by discussing the instances of alleged 'musical sabotage' in connection with the BPO's termination of Roy in the arbitration proceeding.” Instead, arbitrator Robert Rabin “carefully analyzed and discussed the evidence before him and delivered a thorough, well-reasoned and balanced 48-page decision” under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), Judge Telesca decided.

Rabin concluded that “there is no way that Mr. Roy may be restored to his position” with the orchestra, and that his departure, either voluntarily or involuntarily, was the only course of action. “He engaged in unacceptable conduct that made it difficult for the musicians around him to do their job,” noted Rabin, a professor emeritus at Syracuse University College of Law. “His return would cause unacceptable anxiety.”

Roy, a New England Conservatory-trained musician, became the principal of the three oboists at the orchestra in 1995. The orchestra allowed him to return after his first termination in June 2010, after he apologized for his abrasive behavior and attended anger management sessions. He was not paid during what became a six-month hiatus before his January 2011 return.

Though Rabin said he based his ruling only on the recent allegations against Roy, he said it was necessary to keep previous disciplinary problems in mind.

Steven Cohen of Hogan Willig in Amherst, NY, who represented Roy along with managing partner Diane Tiveron, said Roy recorded many of his conversations, which “proved that Pierre Roy's conduct never disrupted the musical quality of any rehearsal or performance.”

“I shudder to contemplate the loss to the aesthetic world if virtuosi were banned from playing because they were moody or temperamental,” Cohen added.

But arbitrator Rabin believed allegations that Roy did not comport himself with collegiality were especially serious in the context of his profession. “It is hard to imagine another work setting in which collaboration, concentration and calm are so essential,” Rabin wrote. “Maybe you could [also] say this about a crew of astronauts or a team of surgeons.”

Rabin related how the orchestra's conductor, JoAnn Falletta, believed that at one point Roy was not playing with the feeling or interpretation expected of a professional musician. Roy's fellow musicians accused him of playing too fast, too slow or out of tune in rehearsals as a way of making their own performances ragged. They also complained that he mimicked their mannerisms or made gestures that made them feel threatened.

District Judge Telesca noted that Rabin discounted some of the stories he was told about Roy. Some musicians said they saw no misbehavior. But Rabin accepted that the “core” of the large body of testimony presented was accurate, Telesca observed.

Roy in part asked the district court to set aside the arbitration award under 9 U.S.C. '10(a)(1) of the FAA for alleged misconduct by arbitration witnesses. But Judge Telesca ruled: “Fatal to Roy's claim is that he has not raised any issue of witness misconduct beyond the expected conflicting testimony in the arbitration hearing. Even assuming that the BPO witnesses perjured themselves, the testimony at that time was discoverable and challengeable at the time of the hearing.”

Roy's challenge to his dismissal went to arbitration under a provision of the Buffalo Philharmonic's contract with its musicians, who are represented by the Musicians Association of Buffalo. The union local is an affiliate of the American Federation of Musicians (AFM).

(Roy sued the union, too, this for breach of duty of fair representation. The claim included for allegedly inadequately representing him in the grievance and arbitration process. But Judge Telesca determined that “none of Roy's allegations are supported by any facts indicating a motivation of bad faith or hostility” on the part of the AFM.)

Rabin recommended that Roy receive a year's compensation as a form of severance, whether he resigned or was terminated. He said Roy's voluntary resignation would give him a “dignified way” to terminate his affiliation with the orchestra.

Scott Patrick Horton, partner at Bond, Schoeneck & King in Buffalo, represented the orchestra along with Diane Pietraszewski, formerly of Jaeckle, Fleischmann & Mugel in Buffalo.

Catherine Creighton, partner at Creighton, Pearce, Johnson & Giroux in Buffalo, represented the Musicians Association of Buffalo.


Joel Stashenko is the Albany Bureau Chief for The New York Law Journal, an ALM sibling of Entertainment Law & Finance.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.