Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Commercial Leasing Law & StrategyKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

<i>Levandusky</i> After 25 Years

By Richard Siegler and Eva Talel
February 29, 2016

For over 25 years, the Court of Appeals' decision in Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp., 75 N.Y.2d 530 (1990) (affirmed in 40 West 67th Street v. Pullman, 100 N.Y.2d 147 (2003)), has stood for the proposition that the actions of condominium and co-op boards are entitled to judicial deference when made in the proper exercise of their business judgment. Levandusky held that discretionary board actions are subject to such deference unless the apartment or commercial unit owner who is challenging the board's action can show that the board acted in bad faith, outside of its authority or not in furtherance of the condominium or co-op's legitimate interests. This deference has been a powerful tool for boards, one that benefits the entities they serve and the overwhelming majority of apartment owners, and avoids the expense and disruption of litigation by encouraging summary dismissal of unwarranted claims.

This article updates our prior ones that dealt with Levandusky and its progeny. See, e.g., Siegler and Talel, “Business Judgment Rule: Board Protection Continues,” N.Y.L.J. , May 6, 2009, at 3, col. 1; Siegler and Talel, “'Levandusky' and Unprecedented Board Influence,” N.Y.L.J., Sept. 5, 2007, at 3, col. 1 and “'Levandusky' at 21: Board Protection Continues,” N.Y.L.J., May 4, 2011, at 3, col. 1. Herein, we review 13 recent cases, dating from 2011 through 2015, that invoked the business judgment rule. The cases discussed below show that Levandusky is still widely applied to give deference to a broad range of board actions.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.