Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
NJ Sports Betting Law Back Before Third Circuit <i>En Banc</i>
The state of New Jersey got a second roll of the dice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in its attempt to legalize sports betting. Last month, the en banc court reheard argument six months after a divided three-judge panel struck down the Garden State's latest sports betting law, with the majority saying the state's most recent attempt still runs afoul of the federal 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA).
In her majority opinion in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) v. Governor of the State of New Jersey, 799 F.3d 259 (3d Cir. 2015), Senior Judge Marjorie Rendell had said the PASPA prohibits states from “authorizing by law” statutes that permit sports betting.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has championed sports betting as a way of revitalizing Atlantic City, NJ's beleaguered casinos. On Oct. 17, 2014, Christie signed S2460, which was passed by both chambers of the state legislature with only slight opposition. The law removed prohibitions on sports betting at casinos and racetracks, but barred sports betting at other locations. At Christie's insistence, the legislation included language that prohibits wagering on any New Jersey colleges, regardless of where the games are played, and limits sports betting to those aged 21 and older.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.