Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Imagine this hypothetical: You are visiting your disabled, elderly father in one of the nation's more than 15,000 nursing homes. He is resting in one of the more than 1.7 million beds available in those many homes. During your visit, your father shows you sores all over his skin, formed because he was confined in bed for hours a day without attention from the local staff. He is also dehydrated from lack of water. As a result, your father's risk of major complications, including cardiac arrest and death, has been substantially raised. What can you do in response? Are there remedies available to compensate for the extra care your father will need because of his deteriorated condition?
Alternatively, if you are advising a health care provider entity, such as the above nursing home, what can you tell them regarding their liability? Is the institution itself at risk because of the personal failings of certain employees? What if it is staffed by independent contractors? Can a uniform plan or employee manual be developed, and will that help?
Unfortunately, the answer to these questions turns on the definition of two words: corporate and negligence. The term “corporate negligence” has no agreed-upon meaning, sometimes even within the same state. This provides the setup for a legal nightmare on both sides in the hypothetical if any personnel or patients have crossed a state boundary recently, or if the institution itself is trans-national in nature.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?