Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Act Preempts Players' Publicity Rights for NFL Films
Twenty-three professional football players brought a class action lawsuit against the National Football League (NFL), claiming that films produced by NFL Films violated their state rights of publicity and constituted false endorsement under '43(a) of the Lanham Act. Twenty of those players settled with the NFL for a fund for the benefit of all former professional players and use of a licensing agency to assist the players in exploiting their publicity rights ' benefits reported to be worth $42 million. However, the other three players (John Dryer, Elvin Bethea, and Edward White) opted out of the settlement and elected to pursue their suit. The U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota granted summary judgment to the NFL on both claims. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed on the basis that the players' rights of publicity were preempted by the Copyright Act and that the films were neither commercial speech nor likely to cause consumers to believe that the players were affiliated with or endorsed the NFL. Dryer v. The National Football League, __ F.3d __ (8th Cir. 2016).
Since 1965, NFL Films has produced hundreds of theme-based compilations of NFL game footage and interviews with players, coaches, and other individuals, with some of the compilations winning awards. The NFL sells the films to individual consumers, broadcasts them on its television network and website, and licenses the right to display them to distributors such as Warner Home Video, Hulu, and ESPN. Dryer, Bethea, and White appeared in featured game footage and gave interviews for use in the films.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.