Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
GAO Finds FDA's Safety Tracking System Lacking
A report issued in December by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), faults the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) management of postmarket drug safety information. The FDA is supposed to keep track of postmarket studies and other data concerning safety problems with FDA-approved medications that have entered the market, but its current systems are apparently inadequate for this purpose. According to the report, “Internal control standards for federal agencies specify that information should be recorded in a form and within a time frame that enables staff to carry out their responsibilities and that relevant, reliable, and timely information should be available for external reporting purposes. However, evaluations conducted by CDER (Center for Druge Evaluation) of data in its database revealed problems with the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of the data.” Because of these inadequate systems, data is not being recorded and made accessible in a way that would allow the FDA to publish statutorily required reports on potential drug safety issues.
According to the report, the FDA agrees with the GAO's findings and is working to improve its systems to address its concerns.
Test Subject Dies While Taking Experimental Drug
A man taking part in a French drug trial died in January while undergoing treatment with an experimental painkiller drug. He was one of 90 healthy men who had volunteered to be tested with the drug, which was being developed by Bial, a Portuguese pharmaceuticals company. The volunteers were given the medication in differing amounts, and at different times. In all, six test subjects had to be hospitalized, and it was feared that three of them might have suffered brain injuries from the medication. Other test subjects had been treated in clinical trials before this group, with no major adverse reactions.
On Feb. 4, the French General Inspectorate of Social Affairs (IGAS) published a report concerning its investigation of the ill-fated drug trial. Although it did not opine as to the cause of the participant's death, the agency found that the French drug trial company involved made several mistakes after its test subject was hospitalized. One of these was carrying on with the experiment the following day, before finding out if the hospitalized subject was recovering (he was not, and his condition had worsened). The company also failed to inform the remaining test subjects about the hospitalized subject's condition, which violated the terms of their signed informed consent forms stating that they would be informed if anything happened that might affect their willingness to continue with the drug trial.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.