Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
After a long gestation, the European Union (EU) trademark package entered force on March 23, 2016. It's intended to streamline the trademark application process and will be the largest reform to EU trademark law in 20 years. Here's a summary of the major revisions the entertainment industry should be aware for dealing with any trademark issues in Europe.
Some key terminology is changing to comply with international naming convention. The “Community Trademark” will become the “European Trademark.” The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market will now be the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
The trademark package recasts both the basic application fee and the renewal fees. The basic fee for a Community Trademark goes from a unique fee of 900 euros for three classes of goods and services (and 150 euros for each subsequent class) to 850 euros for the first class, 50 euros for the second class and 150 euros for each subsequent class. In the new system, an application in one class will therefore cost less than in the current system, while an application in two classes will cost the same price and an application in three or more classes will cost more than in the current system. The system is designed to discourage applicants from filing and maintaining overly broad specifications.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.