Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 26, 2016, a Federal Circuit panel of Chief Judge Prost and Circuit Judges Dyk and Reyna issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge Dyk, in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case Nos. 2015-1171, 2015-1195, and 2015-1994. This is the third appeal of the case heard by the Federal Circuit. In this appeal, the Federal Circuit confronts the core infringement and invalidity issues. The panel reversed the district court's denial of JMOL of non-infringement of Apple's '647 patent, reversed the district court's denial of JMOL of invalidity of Apple's '721 and '172 patents, affirmed the district court's judgment of non-infringement of Apple's '959 and '414 patents, affirmed the district court's judgment of infringement of Samsung's '449 patent, and affirmed the district court's judgment of non-infringement of Samsung's '239 patent.
The Apple '647 Patent
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.