Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 26, 2016, a Federal Circuit panel of Chief Judge Prost and Circuit Judges Dyk and Reyna issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge Dyk, in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case Nos. 2015-1171, 2015-1195, and 2015-1994. This is the third appeal of the case heard by the Federal Circuit. In this appeal, the Federal Circuit confronts the core infringement and invalidity issues. The panel reversed the district court's denial of JMOL of non-infringement of Apple's '647 patent, reversed the district court's denial of JMOL of invalidity of Apple's '721 and '172 patents, affirmed the district court's judgment of non-infringement of Apple's '959 and '414 patents, affirmed the district court's judgment of infringement of Samsung's '449 patent, and affirmed the district court's judgment of non-infringement of Samsung's '239 patent.
The Apple '647 Patent
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.