Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Med Mal News
Professional Association's Censure Not Actionable in Courts
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has determined that a Texas doctor who served as an expert witness and was censured by his professional association for the manner in which he did so may not seek redress against the association in the courts. The facts of the case, Barrash v. American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), began with neurosurgeon Dr. Jay Martin Barrash's testimony against a fellow AANS member accused by a patient of medical malpractice during the patient's bone graft surgery. That surgeon settled with the plaintiff, but then filed a complaint about Dr. Barrash's testimony with the AANS. The Association investigated, and concluded that Dr. Barrash failed to review the X-ray showing the bone graft placement. Dr. Barrash was therefore suspended from membership in the AANS, although the suspension was later reduced to a censure.
Dr. Barrash resigned from the organization and filed suit against it, claiming that the AANS's actions in suspending and then censuring him tainted his professional stature and harmed his ability to serve as an expert witness in future lawsuits. Specifically, he charged the association with tortious interference, breach of contract and impairment of economic interest from denial of due process. The trial court sided primarily with the AANS, though it found the association had failed to follow proper procedures. Dr. Barrash appealed.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?