Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Professional Association's Censure Not Actionable in Courts
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has determined that a Texas doctor who served as an expert witness and was censured by his professional association for the manner in which he did so may not seek redress against the association in the courts. The facts of the case, Barrash v. American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), began with neurosurgeon Dr. Jay Martin Barrash's testimony against a fellow AANS member accused by a patient of medical malpractice during the patient's bone graft surgery. That surgeon settled with the plaintiff, but then filed a complaint about Dr. Barrash's testimony with the AANS. The Association investigated, and concluded that Dr. Barrash failed to review the X-ray showing the bone graft placement. Dr. Barrash was therefore suspended from membership in the AANS, although the suspension was later reduced to a censure.
Dr. Barrash resigned from the organization and filed suit against it, claiming that the AANS's actions in suspending and then censuring him tainted his professional stature and harmed his ability to serve as an expert witness in future lawsuits. Specifically, he charged the association with tortious interference, breach of contract and impairment of economic interest from denial of due process. The trial court sided primarily with the AANS, though it found the association had failed to follow proper procedures. Dr. Barrash appealed.
The Fifth Circuit noted that Dr. Barrash's claims arose out of Texas law, and that Texas courts have traditionally stayed out of disputes concerning the internal management of voluntary associations like the AANS. The only exception to this rule is when the organization's actions are illegal, capricious or against public policy. The court found none of these exceptions applied in this case. “Because Dr. Barrash received due process on the charge of failing to review all pertinent and available records prior to testifying, any further review of the AANS's subsequent censure of that misconduct is precluded by the Texas doctrine of judicial non-intervention,” wrote Judge Edith Brown Clement in her decision.
In response to the decision, Barrish's attorney, Doug Belofsky, a Northbrook, IL, solo, opined that it would have a chilling effect on doctors wishing to testify against fellow members of professional associations, as they would have no opportunity to redress any unfair and retaliatory actions in the courts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.