Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The scenario is common enough: A landlord brings a proceeding against a long-term rent-regulated tenant, sometimes elderly or infirm, who has fallen behind in rent. The tenant struggles to obtain the money, often from slow-moving governmental or charitable sources. “Time of the essence” payment stipulations are entered into, and then violated. A judgment of possession is issued, and multiple stays are obtained. Finally, the tenant offers payment, sometimes pre-eviction, and sometimes post-eviction. What is a court to do?
As two recent cases prove, there is no clear answer. In Lafayette Boynton Hsg. Corp. v Pickett, 135 AD3d 518 (1st Dept 2016), a post-eviction case, the majority affirmed Appellate Term's order restoring the tenant to possession, with Justice David B. Saxe issuing a lengthy concurring opinion that called the current state of the law into question. In contrast, in the pre-eviction case of 191 St. Assoc. LLC v Cruz, 50 Misc3d 137(A) (App Term 1st Dept 2016), Appellate Term majority authorized a tenant's eviction, over a lengthy dissent by Justice Doris Ling-Cohan.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.