Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Duty to Defend and the Affirmative Defense
Specific jurisdictional flourishes notwithstanding, the duty to defend analysis typically involves some form of the “eight corners rule,” whereby the four corners of the insurance policy are measured against the four corners of the complaint (and sometimes extrinsic evidence) in order to determine whether or not the claims set out in the complaint trigger the insurer's duty to defend. When the insured itself initiates a suit, it is not uncommon for the defendant to assert affirmative defenses against the insured's complaint. In such a context, courts must determine whether or not a responsive pleading ' taking the form of either a counterclaim or an affirmative defense ' can trigger the duty to defend in the same way that a traditional lawsuit does.
The majority rule is that while allegations contained within a counterclaim may trigger the duty to defend, an affirmative defense asserted in response to the insured's complaint cannot. Courts following this majority rule apply the plain language of the insuring agreement and require that a “suit” for damages be filed against the policyholder. California appears to be the lone jurisdiction that will consider affirmative defenses in analyzing an insurer's duty to defend.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.