Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Wearable Fitness Tracking Devices
Just 18 months ago, PricewaterhouseCoopers reported that over one out of every five United States consumers currently owns some form of wearable technology. See PwC Health Research Institute, Health Wearables: Early Days, at 2. The hopes and expectations for such devices in connection with health and wellness are very high ' for example, almost half of all consumers surveyed on the issue believed that wearable technology will decrease obesity. See id. at 1. Given such high expectations, as the use of fitness trackers and other personal monitoring devices becomes more prevalent, an increase in consumer litigation over them is inevitable. Because such devices are still cutting-edge in many respects, the opportunities for unexpected manufacturing and design problems is also high. And because some of the data involved may be highly personal, the risk of privacy breach claims is certainly not zero.
Given the relatively small amount of damage that any one individual would likely suffer from these issues with respect to even the most costly of wearable devices, much of this litigation may end up in class actions. Indeed, this pattern is already emerging, as several significant class actions involving wearables have already been attempted. To date, such lawsuits have generally asserted claims for breach of warranty or for unfair and deceptive practices when the devices at issue failed to meet consumer technology expectations. As was true in what may be a parallel example of rapid consumer adoption of technology ' cellphones ' the early wearables cases already demonstrate how attention to issues such as terms and conditions of use, choice of law, and careful advertising and collateral wording will matter a great deal in the resolution of litigation.
The Early Wearables Cases
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.