Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Husband Forfeited Spousal Share of Estate
A Pennsylvania appeals court determined that a trial court properly dismissed a separated husband's petition to strike his deceased wife's sister's claim to the decedent's estate. The husband and the decedent had been separated for years, and the decedent had begun divorce proceedings prior to her death. The appellant husband had forfeited his right to share in the decedent's estate due to his extramarital affairs during the separation. In re Estate of Talerico, PICS Case No. 16-0386 (Pa. Super. March 18, 2016) Panella, J. (10 pages).
The couple were married in 2006 and resided in a house owned solely by the decedent wife. In 2010, the husband moved out of the house and in 2011 the wife began divorce proceedings, though the divorce was not finalized prior to her death in 2014. Pennsylvania's 20 Pa.C.S.A. ' 2106(a) calls for forfeiture of a spouse's share if “for one year or upwards previous to the death of the other spouse, (that spouse) has willfully neglected or refused to perform the duty to support the other spouse”; or if that spouse “for one year or upwards has willfully and maliciously deserted the other spouse,” that spouse “shall have no right or interest under this chapter in the real or personal estate of the other spouse.” Under this code section, all that need be shown, in addition to the neglect element, is that the decedent spouse was a domiciliary of Pennsylvania at the time of death, grounds for divorce had been established, yet the divorce had not yet been finalized.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.