Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ethics and Criminal Practice
Last month, we asked the question: When faced with a client whose social media postings may harm his legal case, is it ethical for the attorney to advise the client to alter or delete those postings?
Rules and Opinions
There is no one rule of professional conduct that addresses what a lawyer can advise a client concerning the use of social media. In New York, first and foremost, a lawyer must comply with Rule 3.4 and ensure that he does not “suppress evidence that the lawyer or the client has a legal obligation to reveal” or “conceal or knowingly fail to disclose that which the lawyer is required by law” to disclose. New York Rules of Professional Conduct, 22 N.Y.C.R.R. 1200, Rule 3.4(a); cf. ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (ABA Rule) 3.4(a); see generally Roy D. Simon, Simon's New York Rules of Professional Conduct, Thomson-Reuters, 2015, Rule 3.4(a). Nor can a lawyer, Rule 3.3 tells us, “make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law.” Rule 3.3 (a)(1); ABA Rule 3.3(a)(1); Simon Rule 3.3. New York's Rule 4.1 similarly prohibits false statements made to third parties. Rule 4.1; cf. ABA Rule 4.1.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
"Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight
The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.