Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

FRCP Amendments: Implications for IP and Patent Troll Litigation

BY Mark A. Finkelstein
May 01, 2016

The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) that took effect on Dec. 1, 2015, are already having an impact on IP litigation, especially patent troll lawsuits. To start, the changes to Rule 26 underscore the importance of proportionality in discovery, a notion that is also central to revised Rule 37, which makes it more difficult to obtain sanctions for an opposing party's failure to preserve electronically stored information (ESI). These changes are helping parties control the costs of discovery, and therefore the costs of litigation, particularly in low-stakes cases brought by non-practicing entities. Further, the abrogation of Rule 84 and Form 18 has heightened the pleading standard for non-practicing entities alleging infringement to the plausibility standard required under Twombly and Iqbal. (See, Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009).) In all, these changes have shifted and will continue to shift the legal landscape ' especially for patent troll litigation ' in favor of defendants. Counsel need to understand these new rules and their implications to properly guide their case strategy.

Changes to Rule 26: The Proportionality Standard

While the former Rule 26 invoked the concept of proportionality in the factors previously found under subsection (b)(2)(C), the new rule incorporates such considerations into the definition of the scope of discovery. That is, Rule 26(b)(1) now provides that parties may obtain discovery “relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case.” Id. (emphasis added). The amendments thus place the proportionality standard front and center, requiring the parties, as well as the courts, to consider whether discovery is proportional considering “the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the parties' resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit.” Additionally, Rule 26(c)(1)(B) authorizes courts to order cost-shifting and allocate the expenses for certain discovery.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models Image

Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.

Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge Image

As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.

Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator Image

How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.

Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising Image

The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.

Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality Image

This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.