Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A bankruptcy trustee, given the responsibility to liquidate estate assets and distribute the resulting funds to creditors, frequently must pursue causes of action against non-debtors who have liability to the estate.
On occasion, an individual creditor acting on its own behalf will file competing claims against such non-debtors. It is not surprising that such competing claims arise frequently in bankruptcy cases involving Ponzi schemes. In those cases, a creditor may have been harmed, not only by the debtor, but by non-debtor parties through whom the creditor invested in the debtor's Ponzi scheme. These independent claims, however, have the potential to interfere with the trustee's recovery efforts. To avoid undue interference and to prevent the lone creditor from recovering for itself assets that should be available to estate creditors as a whole, the trustee frequently must seek injunctive relief to stop the competing creditor actions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.