Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent Massachusetts case held that trust assets were part of the marital estate reachable by the non-spouse beneficiary in the action. Pfannenstiehl v. Pfannenstiehl, 88 Mass. App. Ct. 121 (2015), 37 N.E.3d 15. This case reminds practitioners of a number of important considerations in planning for trusts to minimize the risks of their being breached in a matrimonial action. Several planning suggestions on how practitioners might be able to mitigate these risks, even for existing trusts, are included in this article.
Trust Law
It is vital for matrimonial practitioners to understand that dramatic developments in trust law and trust-drafting practices make the analysis, planning opportunities, and steps quite different from what they may have been historically. While many of these aspects of modern trust planning were not reflected in the Pfannestiehl trust, they are relevant to many client situations, and may have also provided a better outcome to the husband/beneficiary in this case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?