Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Wall Street Journal's front-page headline on billing rates in February tells only part of the story. “Legal Fees Cross New Mark: $1,500 an Hour,” the Feb. 9 article announced (see http://on.wsj.com/1Q5z6y9, subscription req'd.), before listing partner hourly rates at several big firms: $925 to $1,475 at Proskauer Rose; $895 to $1,450 at Ropes & Gray; $875 to $1,445 at Kirkland & Ellis; and so on and so on and so on.
That's great if you can get it, but most firms can't. The 2016 Report on the State of the Legal Market (http://tmsnrt.rs/1PSeStN) from Georgetown University Law Center and Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor tells a second part of the story: Realization and collection rates have plummeted.
How much a firm bills doesn't matter; what it actually brings in the door does. In 2005, collections totaled 93% of standard rates, the report found. By the end of 2015, the realization rate was down to 83%.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?