Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recently, there has been a great deal of press, as well as litigation, involving two things: so-called “overlapping surgery,” and requests by patients to record their encounters with their physicians and with their surgical procedures. Many years ago, in the 1970s, a world-famous cardiac surgeon at Baylor University, Michael DeBakey, at least anecdotally, did both things.
Dr. DeBakey developed, improved and used Dacron Grafts for cardiac surgeries, and was always on the cutting edge of the science. He was known as the “Texas Tornado,” not only because of the incredibly long hours he spent in operating rooms, but for how he went from operating room to operating room doing only the “critical portion” of very complex cardiac procedures. In addition, Dr. DeBakey habitually had a cameraman in the operating room recording these cardiac procedures. His system involved a camera suspended above the operating table, focusing the lens on the procedure. Dr. DeBakey is not alone: In fact, many surgeons film complex procedures, from neurosurgery to general surgical and orthopedic surgical procedures.
How might these two practices ' the employment of overlapping surgery and video recording ' affect physicians, patients and their attorneys when accusations of medical malpractice arise?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?