Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Constitutional Rights and the Expert Opinions Addressing Parental Access and Decision-Making
Frequently, evaluators will offer expert opinions to the court to limit a parent's access to his or her children. Sometimes, evaluators offer expert opinions recommending that a parent's ability to make decisions about his or her child should be removed, often by abdicating to the wishes of the children. Our experience is that many evaluators do not adequately consider the profound constitutional issues involved in such recommendations, and routinely offer opinions about custodial access and decision-making that have little support in the underlying data from which such recommendations and opinions are based. R.E. Emery et al.: A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System. 6 Psych Science in the Public Interest 1 (2005).
Over the years, we have noted with concern how few custody evaluators have understood these profound constitutional issues, which involve offering expert opinions to a court to reduce or diminish a parent's right to parent his or her child. In this article, we provide a brief overview of the constitutional issues that address parental rights, and discuss ideas that others have put forward about children's rights. B. Bix: Best Interests of the Child. Legal Studies Research Paper Series: Research Paper No. 08-08. University of Minnesota Law School (2008). Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1092544; J. Spinak: When Did Lawyers for Children Stop Reading Goldstein, Freud, and Solnit? Lessons from the Twentieth Century on the Best Interests and The Role of the Child Advocate. 41 Fam Law Quarterly 393 (2007); E. Willensen & M. Willemsen: The Best Interest of the Child: A Child's Right to Have Stable Relationships Must Be Central to Custody Decisions. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics (2008). Available at www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v11n1/custody.html. Our hope is that evaluators and the attorneys and judges who appoint them will reflect on the awesome responsibility that is entailed in offering opinions to the court about curtailing or terminating a parent's right to parent his or her child.
Historical Background
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.