Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This article provides a broad overview of cyber security challenges, and the insurance coverage (or lack thereof) for the financial impact of those cyber security challenges.
Background
High-tech crimes come in all shapes and sizes, including computer intrusions, cyber fraud, cyber-based terrorism, and espionage (see Cyber Crime, available at http://1.usa.gov/1NiAcuU), and can have a devastating impact on individuals and businesses. One of the most significant results of a cyber-security event is the accessing of personally identifiable information (“PII”) and/or protected health information (“PHI”) stored on a computer system, which is generally known as a data breach. The PII information sought by hackers can include names, addresses, telephone numbers, financial information, social security numbers, credit card numbers, passwords, security codes, and unique biometric data (fingerprints, voice prints, and retina/iris images).
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.