Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Enjoining Actions Against Non-Debtors
In bankruptcy cases, debtors often believe that enjoining a third party's action against a non-debtor can help preserve or rehabilitate the estate. But debtors rarely seek to enjoin actions against non-debtors, even though bankruptcy courts have the power to grant such injunctions under 11 U.S.C. ' 105(a). Many debtors likely avoid the tactic because enjoining such an action has generally required navigating a variation of the fact-driven, multi-part standard for preliminary injunctions or some other stringent test.
A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, however, appears to change the playing field in debtors' favor. In re Caesars Entm't Operating Co., 808 F.3d 1186 (7th Cir. 2015) established a two-part test that appears far more favorable to debtors than the previous standards applied to such injunctions. Caesars, written by one of the country's most well-respected and cited jurists, Judge Richard Posner, merely requires that a debtor show: 1) the injunction will enhance the debtor's prospects in the bankruptcy proceeding; and 2) the failure to enjoin the action would endanger the proceeding's success.
Standards for Injunctions Under 105(a) Against Non-Debtors
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at customercare@alm.com or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?